He put the fiction in Hebrew science fiction

The cover depicted a large-breasted 
Jewish girl with a raygun.

The online magazine "Tablet" publishes stories about Jewish news and culture, so they were interested when they heard a proposal from writer Shay Azoulay. He wanted to write a short biography about an largely unknown author named Jacob Wallenstein, who in 1955 wrote a thousand-page science fiction novel in Hebrew called "Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow".

As Mr. Azoulay described it, the book was prophetic about the future - among other things, it predicted that people in 2050 would sit in front of "Telewriters" at home and work - machines that combined the functions of the telephone, television and typewriter.

Interesting.

Tablet said they would pay him $250 to publish his essay, called “Jacob Wallenstein, Notes for a Future Biography.”

Yet when they began to fact-check the article, despite Internet searches and phone calls to experts, they could find nothing anywhere about the book, or its author, Mr. Wallenstein. 

It was as if he was so obscure, he never existed.

They were right.

When they confronted Mr. Azoulay, he admitted that he'd made up the whole thing. He said it was his "desperate attempt to get noticed", and he didn't mean to create a literary fraud. Instead, he wanted to create more of a harmless literary hoax.

Tablet was so charmed by his piece that they published it anyway. They compared it to some of the strange literary convolutions of the writer Jorge Luis Borges:
"All he did was distill energies that were already there, urgent but incoherent, into the beautifully tragic figure of a man who ought to have existed but, almost inexplicably, didn’t."
They did, however, publish it as fiction. 

Here's an excerpt. (Remember: this is a fake description of the plot of a fake book, written as a fake biography of a fake author):
"Wallenstein presents the story of a secretary who receives a certain form whose intent is quite clear, but which in her view is not filled out according to her department’s precise demands. Rather than process the form, the secretary returns it to the sender with a note demanding that it be resubmitted in the appropriate manner. The sender does not comply, and instead registers a complaint against the secretary’s claim, along with written proof from his departmental protocol that the form was indeed filled out properly. A supervisor from the interdepartmental coordination office is brought in to resolve the issue and decides that the problem actually lies in the inconsistent methods of classification employed by the different departments. An inspector from the Standards department disagrees and claims that certain terms that appear in the form are inadequately defined. A lexicology department assessor is summoned and… on and on it goes, ad infinitum, and nothing gets done.
Ad infinitum, indeed.

2 comments:

  1. Tablet is apparently run by idiots. They, not Azoulay, created the image at the top of your post (and at the top of their article), but the name of the author on the book cover is completely wrong. Hebrew is a right-to-left language, but the word "Wallenstein" is written from left to right, akin to nietsnellaW.

    More interesting, just as it's obvious to anyone who sees "nietsnellaW" that a capital letter can't be at the end of the word, the last letter in Wallenstein in Hebrew is in a special form that can only appear at the END of a word - and somebody at Tablet apparently noticed this and moved that one letter to the correct place without fixing the rest of the name, so now it reads the equivalent of Wnietsnella.

    Letter-by-letter reversal is actually quite a common problem when copy-pasting Hebrew text into Photoshop. Tablet claims after somebody called them on this in their comments section that it was an intentional joke, but this isn't merely "garbled Hebrew", this is very obviously a mistake.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your comment, Dleina!

    Besides the goofy Hebrew letter-reversals and Tablet's insistence that the wording was intentional, what really concerns me is the unscientific anti-gravity nature of the depicted woman's anatomy.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Related Posts with Thumbnails